Prepare a summary report in which you do the following:

1. Evaluate the company’s operational strengths and weaknesses based on the following:
a. Horizontal analysis results
b. Vertical analysis results
c. Trend analysis results
d. Ratio analysis results
2. Analyze the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc. Consider the following in your analysis:
• Ways to improve the working capital
• Ways to use excess working capital to generate an increase in profits
3. Evaluate the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.
a. Recommend corrective actions for any weaknesses.
b. Identify the risks to the company.
i. Discuss how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.
4. Analyze compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.
a. Recommend corrective actions for noncompliant areas.

MANAGING INTERNAL COST & CONTROLLING FINANCES 326.2 – MANAGING CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL ASSETS 326.4 – MANAGING ENTERPRISE RISK & CONTINUITY 329.4 – MANAGING OPERATIONS

1.  Evaluate the company’s operational strengths and weaknesses based on the following:
a.  Horizontal analysis results
b.  Vertical analysis results
c.  Trend analysis results
d.  Ratio analysis results
2.  Analyze the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc. Consider the following in your analysis:
•  Ways to improve the working capital
•  Ways to use excess working capital to generate an increase in profits
3.  Evaluate the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.
a.  Recommend corrective actions for any weaknesses.
b.  Identify the risks to the company.
i.  Discuss how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.
4.  Analyze compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.
a.  Recommend corrective actions for noncompliant areas.

B.  If you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: Please save word-processing documents as *.rtf (Rich Text Format) or *.pdf (Portable Document Format) files.

Note: When bulleted points are present in the task prompt, the level of detail or support called for in the rubric refers to those bulleted points. Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the paper or project.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the General Instructions section.

Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)    The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.    The candidate provides weak articulation of response.    The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
A1a. Horizontal Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the horizontal analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the horizontal analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the horizontal analysis results.
A1b. Vertical Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the vertical analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the vertical analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the vertical analysis results.
A1c. Trend Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the trend analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the trend analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the trend analysis results.
A1d. Ratio Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the ratio analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the ratio analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the ratio analysis results.
A2. Working Capital    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with insufficient support, of the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with sufficient support, of the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc.
A3. Internal Controls    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient detail, of the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient detail, of the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.
A3a. Weakness Corrective Actions    The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of corrective actions for any weaknesses.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with insufficient detail, of corrective actions for any weaknesses.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with sufficient detail, of corrective actions for any weaknesses.
A3b. Risks    The candidate does not identify the risks to the company.    Not applicable.    The candidate identifies the risks to the company.
A3bi. Risk Mitigation    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.    The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient support, of how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.    The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient support, of how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.
A4. Compliance    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with insufficient support, of compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with sufficient support, of compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.
A4a. Noncompliance Corrective Actions    The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of corrective actions for noncompliant areas.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with insufficient detail, of corrective actions for noncompliant areas.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with sufficient detail, of corrective actions for noncompliant areas.

MANAGING INTERNAL COST & CONTROLLING FINANCES 326.2 – MANAGING CAPITAL AND FINANCIAL ASSETS 326.4 – MANAGING ENTERPRISE RISK & CONTINUITY 329.4 – MANAGING OPERATIONS

1.  Evaluate the company’s operational strengths and weaknesses based on the following:
a.  Horizontal analysis results
b.  Vertical analysis results
c.  Trend analysis results
d.  Ratio analysis results
2.  Analyze the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc. Consider the following in your analysis:
•  Ways to improve the working capital
•  Ways to use excess working capital to generate an increase in profits
3.  Evaluate the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.
a.  Recommend corrective actions for any weaknesses.
b.  Identify the risks to the company.
i.  Discuss how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.
4.  Analyze compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.
a.  Recommend corrective actions for noncompliant areas.

B.  If you use sources, include all in-text citations and references in APA format.

Note: Please save word-processing documents as *.rtf (Rich Text Format) or *.pdf (Portable Document Format) files.

Note: When bulleted points are present in the task prompt, the level of detail or support called for in the rubric refers to those bulleted points. Note: For definitions of terms commonly used in the rubric, see the Rubric Terms web link included in the Evaluation Procedures section.

Note: When using sources to support ideas and elements in a paper or project, the submission MUST include APA formatted in-text citations with a corresponding reference list for any direct quotes or paraphrasing. It is not necessary to list sources that were consulted if they have not been quoted or paraphrased in the text of the paper or project.

Note: No more than a combined total of 30% of a submission can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. For tips on using APA style, please refer to the APA Handout web link included in the General Instructions section.

Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics)    The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response.    The candidate provides weak articulation of response.    The candidate provides adequate articulation of response.
A1a. Horizontal Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the horizontal analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the horizontal analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the horizontal analysis results.
A1b. Vertical Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the vertical analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the vertical analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the vertical analysis results.
A1c. Trend Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the trend analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the trend analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the trend analysis results.
A1d. Ratio Analysis    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the ratio analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the ratio analysis results.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient support, of the company’s strengths and weaknesses based on the ratio analysis results.
A2. Working Capital    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with insufficient support, of the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with sufficient support, of the working capital of Competition Bikes Inc.
A3. Internal Controls    The candidate does not provide a logical evaluation of the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with insufficient detail, of the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.    The candidate provides a logical evaluation, with sufficient detail, of the internal controls for the Competition Bikes Inc. purchasing system.
A3a. Weakness Corrective Actions    The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of corrective actions for any weaknesses.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with insufficient detail, of corrective actions for any weaknesses.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with sufficient detail, of corrective actions for any weaknesses.
A3b. Risks    The candidate does not identify the risks to the company.    Not applicable.    The candidate identifies the risks to the company.
A3bi. Risk Mitigation    The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.    The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient support, of how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.    The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient support, of how to mitigate the risks arising from internal control weaknesses.
A4. Compliance    The candidate does not provide a plausible analysis of compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with insufficient support, of compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.    The candidate provides a plausible analysis, with sufficient support, of compliance with Sarbanes–Oxley requirements.
A4a. Noncompliance Corrective Actions    The candidate does not provide an appropriate recommendation of corrective actions for noncompliant areas.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with insufficient detail, of corrective actions for noncompliant areas.    The candidate provides an appropriate recommendation, with sufficient detail, of corrective actions for noncompliant areas.